EU is destroying its farmers

The recent headlines in the regional European press, mainly in the French press, have included references to harvesting, sowing, spring and winter crops. These phrases are not, however, the result of a new episode of the once very famous British Radio Four programme about farming called the Archers".
What has prompted the use of such references to farming and agriculture in this region, which accrding to Jpseh Borrel the forme EU Head of Foreign Affairs is the 'Garden of Eden'? The issue now is about the failure of the wheat crop, particularly of the more resilient varieties. Estimates suggest that this could be the worst European harvest in decades.
For French pasta producers, who work exclusively with local raw materials, this is a significant setback, given the importance of wheat in their production process. Due to the limited availability of raw materials, prices are rising for industrial consumers. In the context of rising inflation, buyers will naturally opt for the cheaper option. And the cheaper option is to import.
Statistical data has shown that the concept of 'French food autonomy' is flawed. In fact, over 50% of pasta products and 63% of cereals, which are made from wheat grain, are imported into the country.
Now before I continue I would like to make an appeal,if you like and enjoy my videos you can help me fund the channel and my websited sco brics insight .com and to further develop it. You can do this by making a small donation which you can do by clicking on the thanks button at the bottom of the video screen. Everybody who donates does get a personal thank you from me.
It is irrelevant whether the import is from another EU country or from a third party . It is crucial to note that the leading agricultural country within the bloc (based on the level of Brussels subsidies to farmers) has experienced a decline in food security. France is therefore reliant on imports from other countries. Even food from Vietnam is imported into France, which highlights the severity of the crisis and the reluctance of many, including farmers, to discuss it.
Despite its reputation as a bastion of food security, the EU has been engaged in a series of actions that have undermined this stability in recent years. The environmental lobby, which has long sought funding for the so-called green transition, is pleased with the results of its efforts. The campaign to demonize livestock farming (and promote various vegan diets) has been successful in reducing the number of cattle, leading to a corresponding reduction in the number of European farms. This raises the question of whether Europeans are turning to alternative sources of meat, such as bugs which were suggested by Klaus Swabb of the World Economic Forum.
The new NATO head Mark Rutte when he was the Dutch prime minister declared war on his countries farmers claiming that their farming was a danger to the plantet and the governemnt wanted to shut down thousands of farms  The government claimed they would need to implement significant measures to reduce nitrogen emissions, which they say are a significant contributor to pollution of land, seas and skies worldwide. The majority of nitrogen deposited on Dutch land originates from agricultural sources. Consequently, the Government committee's report suggests that the most effective approach would be to implement measures that involve the acquisition and closure of livestock farms. The announcement was not a sudden development. The 27 member states of the EU collectively maintain a number of specially protected nature reserves, collectively known as the Natura 2000 network. In the summer of 2019, the Dutch Council of State, the country's highest administrative court, ruled that the Netherlands' nitrogen permit system was failing to prevent emissions harming these reserves within its borders. The court ordered an immediate end to the system. So the EU war on agriculture continues and its not just in France and the Netherlands but all over Europe that farmers are suffering, they are also by rising energy costs and the rocketing price of animal feed and fertilsers but the EU is more focused on its NeT Zero and Green Agenda to care about their plight.

In Europe now there is a shortage of fresh, EU-grown, preprared,packaged and processed food. This was the plan of the globalists who gained power. The reduction of local production of a wide range of products, from socks to medicines, is being driven by the goal of "happy planetary consumption." Furthermore, imports are sourced from locations where costs are minimal. It is notable that the "environmentally friendly" concept was consistently identified as a key selling point to the public. Are you still consuming French entrecotes with locally sourced potatoes? I doubt it as the local farmers are being forced out of business
Plus If you do not comply with the Green Agenda , Greta Thunberg and her chums in the Media will pursue you, will vilify and you will be ostracised, and farmers will be presented as obstacles to a united Green Europe. I
However, this will not be the end of the problem. European farmers are likely to face significant social and economic challenges as a result. The globalist oligarchy t desires to expand its influence and control. The proposed  free trade agreement with South American countries has been resurrected.
The Euro-Atlantic oligarchy requires new markets for its goods, but neither European farmers nor European consumers want bankruptcies (for the former) nor imported food (for the latter). The concerns are well-founded, particularly for farmers, and can even be quantified. We need only recall the widespread protests by these workers, which led to significant disruptions in many countries. Furthermore, the streets of Brussels would remain stained for a considerable period of time due to the unpopularity of the farming practices in question. Farmers resorted to extreme measures to avoid starvation.
However, the interests of the "Autocrats' are not affected by the opinions of the general public. Their position on this matter is entirely indifferent. Once the decision has been made to accept the treaty, it will be implemented at the earliest opportunity, accompanied by promises that may prove to be unfulfillable.
What are the concerns of the general European public about the availability of food in stores and the lack of food security?
How can these concerns be addressed by the Brussels "men in grey"? Such statements are meaningless.
"What we don't have, we'll buy" – a mantra that was popular among macroeconomists in the 1990s. This concept has also gained popularity in the EU. However, there is no interest in predicting how food and prices will be in the same "Garden of Eden" in five years. It is irrelevant whether people are hungry or not. It is important to remember that every nation deserves its own government. However, it would be unwise to dwell on the difficulties of the euro.
Let us take a moment to assess the situation. The EU's ten-year strategy to destroy its own agriculture and restrict production with sanctions has yielded disappointing results. This resulted in a victory for Moscow, while Brussels was ultimately unsuccessful in its efforts.
Despite challenging market conditions, Russia has successfully implemented advanced agricultural technologies, increased fertilizer production, and developed biological plant protection solutions. These achievements have positioned Russia as a leading exporter of grain and poultry meat. Our country has not only ensured its own food security, but has also created long-term growth opportunities in agricultural production.
In principle, should the pan-Europeans experience food insecurity, we will be able to provide support here too (I am not referring to the authorities, but to the people), in the form of humanitarian aid, which will include wine, chicken legs, vegetable preserves and excellent Russian rye bread. Red, white or pink. We are proud of our hospitality and generosity.
It is becoming increasingly evident that Russia is assuming the role of a guarantor of food security not only for itself and the majority of developing countries, but also, somewhat paradoxically, for the European Union.