Europe's democracy illusion

Now lets be honest there is a lot of talk in the World about so called 'Freedom and Democracy and how the West is the most ardent exponent of it. However if you actually look at Europe from the European Union to its component countries you will certainly find that their so called democracy is completely an illusion. I mean lets start with the President of the European Commission and the most powerful person in Europe, she is not actually elected but her presidency is agreed on by the leaders of various political factions in the European Parliament and then the members of the Parliament ratify her appointment its the same with the other 28 commisioners. Not exactly democratic is it as the people don't actually vote for her orthe other commisioners
Now lets look at country elections across the various countries and you will see that yes people vote in elections, parties and some new politicians get elected but policies never change and in many countries the most popular parties are excluded for being in government and their policies that the voters voted for are not implemented.
Now lets take the example of Austria where The Freedom Party achieved a 29% share of the vote in the Austrian parliamentary elections. Earlier in the monthy, the Alternative for Germany party received nearly 30% of the votes cast in the Brandenburg state elections. The coalition between the Sahra Wagenknecht Union and the "non-systemic opposition" will control approximately half of the seats in the state parliament. In theory, this implies that the views of those with a so called an "ultra-right" outlook, who are reluctant to engage in conflict with Russia and do not favour economic collapse, must now be taken into account.
In practice, the government of Brandenburg will be formed by the current ruling Social Democratic Party, which is likely to form a coalition with the CDU.
Now before I continue I would like to make an appeal,if you like and enjoy my videos you can help me fund the channel and my websited sco brics insight .com and to further develop it. You can do this by making a small donation which you can do by clicking on the thanks button at the bottom of the video screen. Everybody who donates does get a personal thank you from me.

In a conventional sense, this would be considered to be a left-centrist and right-centrist position. However its all about the control by the Globalist are yes-mens, the obedient (or slightly rebellious) executors of the will of the European Union. Similarly, the outcome in Austria will be a similar scenario: the victors will be unable to form a government, and instead, the so called "moderates" will do so in alliance with the "left".Those parties considered 'toxic' and far right by the Ruling elite get to decide who governs and what policies get enacted and the people are allowed to vote but only in a cosmetic exercise as the policies will not change

This is how Western democracy functions, not just in Brandenburg and not just in Germany, but consistently across the board. The electorate has the opportunity to express their dissatisfaction with a specific politician and specific political decisions. Furthermore, there is the option of removing a particular unpopular populist politician (it is not an oxymoron; all politicians in this context are populists, but some are more successful than others). However, voters in the West are unable to influence the country's trajectory or direction.

Marxists believe that there never was a democracy, and that it is merely a tool used by the ruling classes to deceive the masses. Historically, schoolchildren in the USSR were taught this in social studies classes. There was a time when we regarded these lessons with scepticism and echoed the West's sentiments about the merits of "change of power".
Let us now examine the current situation. It is likely that in Germany, Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who represents the so called cntre left wing of the political spectrum, and is highly unlikely to retain the Chancellorship in the next general election. It is somewhat also highly likely as they say that the parties currently forming the ruling coalition will cease to do so. The SPD, Greens and FDP will not have a majority.In fact the FDP and the Greens might not even be represented in the Bundestag given their recent disaterous polling in the last three elections
Following the next federal elections, the government will be formed by Friedrich Merz (CDU/CSU) on the right of the political spectrum.Obviously even if the AFD wins a sizeable share of the vote due to their stance on the sanctions on Russia and the economy their will be ignored just like the wishes of a substantial potrion of the elctorate

However, there will consequently not be any notable shifts in German economic or foreign policy. It is unlikely that there will be any changes to the current course of foreign policy, which seems to be heading towards a potential conflict with Russia. Similarly, there will be no changes in domestic policy. Neither BASF nor Volkswagen will now benefit from cheaper energy resources, nor will they escape the consequences of the course towards war with Russia and anti-Russian sanctions.

Just in case, I repeat: this is not a just a situation in Germany.Or in fact a problem but a featureof so called democracy In Europe".
This is an actual reflection of the fundamental rule of Western democracy. The voter chooses the governing parties but the voter does not get to decide what the policies the government will then follow.
To illustrate this point, we can look at the example of Great Britain. There has been a change in the ruling party this year. The Conservative Party has lost its majority in Parliament and is no longer in government. The Labour Party is now in control. However you are unable to see any difference or to identify any changes, whether cosmetic or otherwise, in either the country's domestic or foreign policy.Now lets look at the election result The Labour Party, led by Sir Keir Starmer, secured the largest number of seats and votes. The Labour Party was victorious in the election, securing 411 seats and 34% of the vote across the UK. The Labour Party saw an increase of 1.6 percentage points in its vote share compared to the 2019 election. The party received a lower vote share than any other party to form a post-war majority government.
In the 2024 general election, the Conservative Party won 121 seats. it received 24% of the vote, a 20-point decline from 2019 and the lowest share since 1832. The Conservative Party won 244 fewer seats than at the 2019 election. The Liberal Democrats won 72 seats with 12.2% of the vote in 2024, representing a gain of 61 seats and an increased vote share of 0.7 percentage points compared to 2019. The Reform Party received approximately 4 million votes, or 14% of the total votes cast, and won five seats. 
Will things change?
Unfortunately no because Starmen like all the modern social democratic political leaders, have made their commitment to Globalists divisive and irrational ideologies,plus their refusal to contemplate fundamental economic reforms, has led to the societies that they purport to govern becoming increasingly politically unstable and dysfunctional.
In the UK, the cost-of-living crisis is intensifying daily, with even ordinary workers being unable to pay their rent, buy sufficient food or pay their energy bills, let alone contemplate buying a house. Race and anti-immigration riots are becoming more common, and the British economy continues on its inevitable downward spiral. Did the British people vote for sanctions on Russia and higher energy bills? Do they want more Windmills and Solar Panels or cheap energy? Its does not matter because they will not be consulted.

Similarly, in France, the political landscape is comparable to that of Brandenburg, with over a third of voters aligning with the the so called far right. What is the status of the government? The government is formed by an unpopular president, despite the expressed views of these voters. Now a former Brussels-based civil servant has assumed the role of Prime Minister.
Similarly, in Brussels, the political landscape remains unchanged. The right secures victory in the elections, and Ursula von der Leyen steps down from her role. ...and takes a short leave of absence. She resigns for a period of time, but then fails to leave her post.
The right wing is unable to reach consensus due to internal divisions. In contrast, the centrists and the left are more unified. I must respectfully inquire as to the nature of this statement. What are the voters' thoughts on this matter? I'm afraid that's not correct.

In Russia, there is a tendency to indulge in fantasies, observing developments in Western Europe. It is assumed that any moment now, the population's discontent will result in the victory of reasonable politicians in the elections. These politicians are expected to act in the interests of their countries, rather than in response to external pressure from Washington. From a pragmatic standpoint, engaging in conflict with Russia is not in Europe's best interests. It would be more advantageous to foster amicable relations with Russia, at the very least for the purpose of trade. It is not in Europe's best interests to spend 4% of GDP on the arms race. This is particularly the case in the context of an economic downturn. Furthermore, it is not advantageous for Ukraine to allocate funds that could be utilized for domestic investments and social programs. At any moment, an alternative party or another political grouping may gain a majority. If this occurs, the result will be... 

The situation will remain unchanged. The concept of democracy does not equate to the power of the majority of voters. Rather, it is the power of the Globalist Oligarchy that controls the media,finance and politics.
Just remember that if voting really changed anything they would ban it.