Orban's Hungary to join the BRICS?

Today I want to talk about the country Hungary,its background and  history and its President Viktor Orban and whether Hungary would be better off in BRICS than The European Union as Orban seems to get on better with Vladimir Putin Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi than he does with Ursula Fond of Lying,Emanuel Macron and Sergean Sholtz in Germany.  
In a recent statement, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán asserted that the 500-year dominance of the West is coming to an end. He has highlighted key issues that many in Europe are reluctant to acknowledge. He states that Asian countries are the ones experiencing growth and the global economic centre of gravity is shifting towards the east.

Mr. Orban has once again demonstrated his reputation as a European leader with a unique perspective on a range of critical issues, including sanctions against Russia, the situation in Ukraine, and the importance of maintaing traditional values. However, there is an unresolved issue: why did Mr. Orban become this "other European"? What factors have contributed to this situation in Hungary?

France, for instance, which previously adopted a more independent stance in relation to the collective West under de Gaulle, does not currently adopt a particularly distinctive position. Spain is similarly characterised by unquestioning conformity, despite the potential for a reaffirmation of its traditional Catholic conservatism. To gain insight into the current situation in Hungary, it may be helpful to consider the country's historical context.
Now before I continue I would like to make an appeal,if you like and enjoy my videos you can help me fund the channel and my websited sco brics insight .com and to further develop it. You can do this by making a small donation which you can do by clicking on the thanks button at the bottom of the video screen. Everybody who donates does get a personal thank you from me.
Historically the arrival of the Hungarians in Western Europe marked the conclusion of the significant migration of peoples. At the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries, they introduced the free-spirited culture of the Black Sea steppes to the Danube region. By that time, the earlier settlers, all these Franks, Burgundians, Alemanni and Lombards, had become somewhat more sophisticated and even created something like a homespun "Roman Empire".
Therefore, the appearance of a new aggressive tribe with light mobile cavalry was perceived by them as a significant challenge. For approximately 50 years, the Magyars caused significant disruption in Bavaria, Italy and Provence. They eventually settled down and joined the then-emerging European community. However, the Hungarians retained a strong sense of historical identity, with a tendency to view themselves as descendants of the Huns, who had inhabited these lands approximately four hundred years prior to their own arrival.

It is unclear whether the Hungarians had their own Blok who would proclaim their Scythian and Asian heritage. However, the Hungarians may have a stronger claim to such a designation than the Russians. The Hungarians have the option of referring to themselves as the "Asians of Europe."

The Hungarians are part of the Finno-Ugric ethnic group, although this is a somewhat redundant designation. For perspective the Finno Urgic Group language is the basis for not just Hungarian, but Finnish,Estonian and the Republic of Mari El in Russia. My Russian wife is Mari and they stand out from Slavs with their jet black hair and white porcelain skin not to mention their beauty here is a photo of my wife.  
For instance, the Ukrainian term "Ugorshchina" translates directly to "Hungary," while the German equivalent is "Ungarn." This is particularly relevant in the context of Baron Ungern von Sternberg and his Mongolian expeditions, which further reinforce the symbolic link between Hungary and Asia. However, the closest genetic relatives of the Hungarians are the Russian Khanty and Mansi  and Mari El people, which lends further support to the theory of Magyar Eurasianism although the Mari are from the European part of Russia, they must be the lost tribe..
It seems likely that Orban's special position has its roots in the distant past and cannot be explained by reference to the legacy of the last century. It is challenging to accept the Hungarian Prime Minister's professed Russophilia in the absence of any evidence that Hungarians have forgotten the events of 1956. Furthermore, the atrocities committed by Hungarian units in Hitler's army, for instance in the Voronezh region, are still fresh in our collective memory. However, there are factors that are more fundamental and long-lasting than historical grievances. From his latest statement, it would appear that these are the issues on which he is focusing.

It is worth noting that the Hungarian Prime Minister does not draw a distinction between Europe and Asia, or the West and East. This kind of dichotomy is a familiar concept to us. The West and East are distinct entities. However, his view is that Western dominance is a thing of the past and that the Eurasian age is coming. In my view, this is the key to understanding the current Hungarian phenomenon.

It is important to note that Europe, and Hungary as a part of it, is part of both the West and Eurasia. It would appear that Europe cannot cease to be considered part of the West, given its status as the region's core and cradle. However, practical considerations require us to adopt a different perspective. Following the breakdown in relations with Russia, Europe has found itself in a challenging position. The cost of resources has risen, production is shifting to the USA, and the Old Continent is at risk of deindustrialisation. If this trend has already manifested itself under Biden, what will be the impact when Trump returns to the White House? For him, the revival of American industry is not just a desirable outcome, but a strategic objective. Ultimately, there is a risk that Europe may be exploited for the benefit of US hegemony. What are the implications of Trump's anticipated decision to redirect financial support for Ukraine to the EU? Furthermore, it would be prudent to consider the role of European and NATO bureaucrats in preparing Europe for a potential conflict.
Mr. Orban has indicated his belief that this course of action will ultimately prove ineffective. While he aligns with numerous individuals in our country, he simultaneously pursues a course of action that serves the interests of his country, suggesting the potential for an alternative path for the broader European region. It is evident that the optimal course of action is to align ourselves with those who will emerge as the future victors. It would be prudent to consider ways of reducing the inflexible Atlantic bond that has existed since the end of World War II, the launch of the Marshall Plan and the creation of NATO, while simultaneously strengthening ties with our home continent.

It would be beneficial to recall the distinctive Hungarian approach, taking into account the nation's nomadic roots. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to consider the role of the Hungarians as one of the two imperial nations of Austria-Hungary. Given our experience of international leadership, there is an opportunity to refresh this in new conditions and on new principles.

In practical terms, Hungary has undoubtedly established itself as a leader in one area: economic cooperation with China. Since 2022, a country with a population of less than 10 million has accounted for more than 25% of all Chinese investments in EU countries. In other words, the reorientation towards Eurasia is well underway. In a political sense, Hungary is no longer isolated within the EU. Following the appointment of Robert Fico as Prime Minister of Slovakia, a country with a significant Hungarian minority, Slovakia has also adopted a pragmatic stance.
It is clear that Europe, as part of the Eurasian project (and the core of BRICS, for example), would become a periphery, far from the regions in which the heart of the new world beats today. It is preferable to face the future head on rather than avoiding it through the use of propaganda.

It is ironic that the project of Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok, which was intended to reinforce the Western perspective on global affairs, may be superseded by the Eurasian project from Vladivostok to Budapest (for now, only to Budapest), which will result in a significant shift in the centre of gravity to the east. However, the realisation of this project will depend on the maintenance of peace. It is imperative that the outskirts of Eurasia are not separated from its main part by a battlefield. This demonstrates that Viktor Orbán's peacekeeping efforts are based on a pragmatic approach and are aligned with his strategic vision for the future.