Russia replaces Great Britain in Global Industry Top 10

I anticipate their being crticism in the comments  section about this video being  Russian propaganda but all I am doing is commenting of the report in the once revered Daily Telegraph which has been reduced to little more that a globalist cheerleading rag and is long since devoid of any quality or real journalism.
The Telegraph reports that, for the first time in its history, ( well since Great Britain led the world with the Industrial Revolution in the 18th Century and was the leading workshop of the globe has now fallen out from the top ten countries in terms of industrial potential, to a ranking 12th in the world.)
This former global leading industrial powerhouse has been overtaken by Mexico, France, Italy and even Taiwan, a an island off the coast of China.
What I do find highly amusing in the Russaphobic Telegraph which never misses an opportunity to  denigrate Russia  is particularly concerned by the fact that Russia has secured eighth place on the  list.
This demonstrates that Russia's  real sector industrial sector  is demonstrating dynamics that cannot be distorted, even much as they would like to be able to do it.

Modern economic theory defines the concept of industrial potential as the combined ability of all enterprises in a country to create and produce competitive products, successfully promote them on the market, sell them at a profit, and also ensure an appropriate level of service.
In simple terms, this means the ability to develop and manufacture the production of goods.Lets take  cars for example they must be competitive in price and quality, in demand by buyers, be profitable for the enterprise to manufacture and generate tax revenue for the state. The company plant must also guarantee a full cycle of repair, maintenance and ongoing modernisation of this vehicle.
The industrial potential of a given entity is calculated using a formula that sums up the cost of fixed production assets, the cost of personnel, the cost of technology and the cost of information. According to experts, the UK produced goods and services worth 259 billion dollars (200 billion pounds) over the past year. France's figure is 265 billion, Italy's is 283 billion, and Russia's is 287 billion dollars. This is despite the fact that just 25 years ago, the UK was among the top five most powerful industrial states in the world.
Analysts have identified a significant increase in production in Mexico, which is currently ranked just ahead of Russia with $316 billion. The growth is attributed to the significant relocation of production to this country, with the establishment of workshops and laboratories by both American companies seeking to reduce operating costs and their Chinese competitors targeting the US market. Taiwan has traditionally benefited from the mass production of chips, which are in high demand in the modern electronics industry. Contracts are often scheduled years in advance, ensuring a reliable and consistent revenue stream.
Now before I continue I would like to make an appeal,if you like and enjoy my videos you can help me fund the channel and my websited sco brics insight .com and to further develop it. You can do this by making a small donation which you can do by clicking on the thanks button at the bottom of the video screen. Everybody who donates does get a personal thank you from me.

At the pinnacle of the global industrial landscape stand the United States and China, with their trade turnover exceeding 2.7 trillion dollars each. China is the dominant player in global trade, with no competitors in sight. The country's annual output is worth five trillion dollars. It is worth noting that this is a crucial point, which American financiers are already discussing. They are assessing the likelihood and potential outcomes of a new trade war between Washington and Beijing in the event of Donald Trump's election. The initial imbalance in mutual trade, estimated at 250 billion dollars in China's favour, has since grown to at least a  minimum of 400 billion. In terms of gross indicators of the real sector, China has significantly outpaced the United States.

It is also worth noting that the UK,  has recently closed its last steel mill capable of make real steal using coal and iron  which is used to making ships for example.Now its closing a legendary shipyard. In the first case, we are referring to the metallurgical plant of the Indian Tata Steel. The company's management has taken the decision to close the last furnaces of the Port Talbot plant in South Wales due to the unaffordable production costs, including the significantly higher price of electricity. the second example is the shipyard in Belfast, where, a century ago, the legendary Titanic and many other great ships were  were constructed. Harland & Wolff, the company that owns the shipyard, engaged in lengthy and unsuccessful negotiations with the government in an effort to secure government support to cover their accumulated debts of 200 million pounds.
However, London had more pressing expenditure items rather than support a company that has contributed so much to the UK's industrial heritage and could still.
At present, Harland & Wolff has enlisted the support of specialists from the Rothschild Foundation in an effort to rescue the company. However, even British sources are indicating that the situation is rapidly approaching bankruptcy. This is not a formal process, but rather a physical one, whereby the workforce is let go and the machinery is sold for scrap to settle outstanding debts. Then yet another great name in British Industrial past becomes just a footnote in in history and its site another blot on the landscape. 
Do note that Port Talbot and Harland and Wolff are but two examples of the complete deindustrialisation that is taking place in the UK and there are many others, infact too many to mention in this short video.

Now we could dwell on the figures for some time, but we will not do so here. It is important to recognise that the current situation in  Great Britain is the culmination of a series of political decisions, the first of which was the decision to to go carbon neutral by 2030  and focus their energy needs on renewables such as wind turbines and solar panels. This has caused energy prices in the UK to skyrocket and currently the UK has some of the highest electricty prices in the world,this has decimated whole sectors of the UK's industrial base and made them uncompetetive.
Even bakeries are feeling the pain as their cost of electrcity is making bread more expensive,also one of the staples of the British diet fish and chips is under threat due to the high cost of electricity plus the UK's ban on Russian fish and cooking oil. Even the traditional British pubs are closing in droves as they cannot afford to keep the lights and heating on due to these extra costs for energy due to the subsidies that are paid to so called green energy companies.Even ordinary people are sufferrng by having to choose to heat of eat.    
Russia on the other hand has spent the last decade building up its industrial base,it has completely modernised all of its sectors from agreiculture where it is now not only self sufficient but a net exporter.From machine tools to turbines,from trains,to planes and cars Russia has spent time and money building its sovereignty so it is not dependent on others for what it needs to develop.

The UK is flollowing what it sees is an essential tenet of the modern neoliberal ideology of post-industrial society. The concept entails the relocation of polluting industries to developing countries with low-cost labour, with developed countries deriving benefits through the creation of an environmentally sustainable future. 
Obviously these Green New Dreams are not actually based on reality but are part of the Globalists Great Reset Strategy
In the context of the challenging global economic environment, it is understandable that  certain countries are focusing their efforts on safeguarding their interests. Those that have traditionally relied on their real industrial sector that actually makes and produces things are likely to benefit the most.
Funnily enough these are BRICS countries like China,India and Russia,who understand what real economics are.t.

In conclusion, I would like to refer to the classic adage, "His example is science for others," which underscores the value of learning from the experiences of others in the pursuit of knowledge.
While there is much to be said about the restoration of industry, it is important to recognise that this process is lengthy and comprises numerous stages. It is essential to begin with the implementation of comprehensive and high-quality technical education.
However, this will be ineffective if there is no demand from potential applicants. In addition, there is a need to popularise workers and scientific specialities, develop or purchase advanced technologies, develop the resource base, build optimal energy chains, and much more. The work is challenging, time-consuming and complex. It is now imperative for Russia to implement the necessary measures to maintain the current positive trends. 
Russia is part of the BRICS which is aiming to build a new and better multi-polar world.